EDITORIAL POLICY_Review system


Review system


Evaluación

Historia Agraria will acknowledge the receipt of any original manuscripts received, and the Editorial Committee will reply within a period of no more than six months. Those articles that successfully negotiate this initial stage involving an internal review by the Committee will be sent to independent anonymous reviewers, who will decide upon the convenience of an article’s publication and, as appropriate, will make any pertinent recommendations or suggestions. Those articles commissioned by the Editorial Committee and the ones appearing in monographic issues, coordinated by guest editors, will also be assessed anonymously and reviewed by the journal’s editors.

The process involves a double-blind review, which means that both the authors and the reviewers remain anonymous. The decision to publish an article may be conditional upon the introduction of modifications in the original manuscript, pursuant to the criteria of the reviewers and the editor. The recommendations they make will be passed on to the authors by the editor or associate editors. The final version will be submitted to the editor in electronic format. The editor will inform authors of their manuscript’s definitive acceptance for publication in the journal and, as appropriate, the issue in which it will appear.

Historia Agraria publishes its editorial procedures on the CWTS platform Responsible Journals.


Reviewers (downloadable as pdf)

1998-2004: 1998-2004
2005: 2005
2006: 2006
2007: 2007
2008: 2008
2009: 2009
2010: 2010
2011: 2011
2012: 2012
2013: 2013
2014: 2014
2015: 2015
2016: 2016
2017: 2017
2018: 2018
2019: 2019
2020: 2019
2021: 2021
2022: 2022
2023: 2023